The last couple of films I’ve seen are in
some ways very different from one another: a Hollywood blockbuster and an arty
German film. But they both have strong messages about the value of mercy. I’ll
start with the one you’re more likely to have seen.
On boxing day, I joined the masses (most
immediately in the form of my brother, brother-in-law, niece and nephew) and
went to see The Hobbit. The core
moral message of the film comes when Galdalf the wizard tells the young hobbit
Bilbo Baggins that “true courage is about knowing not when to take a life, but
when to spare one.”
I am told by my Tolkien expert friend Neal
that this speech is not in the book. There it is demonstrated simply by the
behaviour of Bilbo when he finds himself in a position to kill the miserable
creature Golem (a memorable scene in the film). At this moment Bilbo is wearing
a ring which, like the ring of Gyges in Plato’s Republic, at once makes him
invisible and tests his moral mettle. Tolkien’s ring exercises an actively
corrupting influence over its wearer, so the fact that Bilbo shows mercy to
Golem at this moment is a significant turning point in the story, and a proof
of his moral strength.
Perhaps the film-makers felt it necessary
to make the message about the value of mercy explicit because so much of the
rest of the film contradicts it. The many violent action sequences are hard to
interpret as anything but a celebration of killing - one that is both graphically
disturbing and repetitive to the point of boredom, or at least considerable frustration
that these scenes are allowed to slow the progress of the plot to the pace of a
troll’s thought processes. (The evident reason for this is commercial – the
makers intend to milk the slender novel for not one but three blockbuster
films.) For me, this inconsistency was a major flaw of the film.
But I did like the Gandalf’s message to Bilbo.
And as it happened, the idea that true courage is about knowing when to spare a
life was also expressed in the next film I saw, which was a clever German
film called The Door (Die Tür, 2009, directed by Anno Saul,
based on a novel by Akif Pirinçci, starring Mads Mikkelsen).
The
Door tells the story of an artist, David, whose young
daughter drowns while he is cheating on his wife with a neighbor. Five years
after her death, he is a broken man. On the verge of killing himself, he
discovers a door into the past: he has the opportunity to go back in time and
do things differently. He takes it, of course. (If you haven’t seen the film
and don’t want to have the plot spoiled, skip the next two paragraphs.)
Like a guardian angel, David arrives just
in time to save his daughter. But to relive his life differently – and more lovingly
- from this point, he finds he must kill his earlier self (literally). Having
done the deed, he buries his younger self in a shallow grave in the backyard. He
soon discovers that he is not alone in this radical form of self-rejection. As
the plot begins to twist, he finds himself in a bizarre culture of
murder/suicide, led by a bullying criminal – he discovers that his
neighbourhood is full of people who have found the time-tunnel and taken the
lives of their former selves. Only the children are really themselves, in the
usual sense.
Just as he has fully taken in the horror of this situation, David’s wife,
Maja, arrives from the future. Unlike the others (and more like Bilbo in his
encounter with Golem), Maja refrains from killing her earlier self when she has
the chance. Instead, she allows this younger self to travel through the door
into the future with her child, just before David deliberately destroys the passageway
leading to it.
This means that at the end of the film, David is more or less
returned to his situation at the beginning. He and Maja share a difficult past
they cannot erase, and must live on without their daughter. But now they have
consciously chosen to accept these facts rather than fighting or fleeing them. The film ends with a poignant shot of David tenderly taking hold of Maja’s
hand as they sit together by the empty pool where their daughter drowned.
The moral message of The Door is left implicit. It takes a while for it to emerge from
the mind-bending time-travel and black humour of the plot. But if it were put
in the mouth of a wise old wizard, it might go something like this: “true
courage is about knowing not when to judge or end a life, but when to accept
life just as it is, and go on living – and loving - as well as you can.”
2 comments:
Thanks.
I like the following statement of a sentiment similar to the moral of The Door. (Footnote: ... although, to be honest, I have no idea what this really means, because I've only seen it out of context. But it's the out-of-context meaning that I like. :-) It's only my professional superego that makes me mention the context at all.)
"There is something to be learned from a rainstorm. When meeting with a sudden shower, you try not to get wet and run quickly along the road. But doing such things as passing under the eaves of houses, you still get wet. When you are resolved from the beginning, you will not be perplexed, though you still get the same soaking. This understanding extends to everything."
attrib. Yamamoto Tsunetomo, Hagakure: The Book of the Samurai
Thanks, Jason - lovely quote.
And for the Tolkien fans, here's some more from Neal:
In The Lord of the Rings, long after the events portrayed in The Hobbit, Gandalf has a conversation with Frodo concerning the morality of killing. When Frodo hears of the disaster Gollum has caused, he says, "it is a pitty Bilbo didn't kill him when he had the chance."
Gandalf replies:
“Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. For even the very wise cannot see all ends. I have not much hope that Gollum can be cured before he dies, but there is a chance of it. And he is bound up with the fate of the Ring. My heart tells me that he has some part to play yet, for good or ill, before the end; and when that comes, the pity of Bilbo may rule the fate of many - yours not least.”
Post a Comment